News
Bluetongue Latest
12/12/08
BLUE TONGUE DISEASE – DON’T
IMPORT IT!
Following the discovery of Blue Tongue Disease (BTV)
in England in 2007, no new cases of circulating disease
have been found in 2008. This has been primarily
due to the very successful vaccination campaign during
2008. It is estimated that over 90% of susceptible
animals in East and South East England have been
vaccinated. However, the uptake of vaccine has been
much lower in other parts of the country and the
overall coverage in the whole of England is thought
to be only about 60%. Wales and Scotland have been
running separate vaccination campaigns and there
are no data yet on the coverage in those two countries.
There
is a risk that the farming community might become
complacent, thinking that BTV in Britain has been
beaten and that there is no need to vaccinate again
in 2009. Nothing could be further from the truth.
One only needs to look at the latest map of BTV throughout
Europe to see that the risk is not only still present
but even greater than ever. BTV.8, the serotype found
in England, has spread throughout most of Western
Europe, with the exception of the Republic of Ireland
and Portugal. It has spread as far south as Spain
and Italy, north to Sweden and east to Poland, Hungary,
Slovakia and Romania. Even more worryingly, BTV.1
has now spread to north-western France and BTV.6
has been found in The Netherlands. There is no vaccine
available against BTV.6 and there is no cross-immunity
between BTV.8 and BTV.1 or BTV.6.
Britain therefore
remains at risk of re-introducing BTV.8 and of introducing
BTV.1 and BTV.6 either by cross-Channel spread of vectors
(which is how BTV.8 reached us last year) or by the legitimate
trade in animals imported from other EU Member States.
To control those risks, the British farming community
therefore needs to:
Carry on vaccinating against BTV.8 during 2009, giving
boosters to all animals vaccinated during 2008, preferably
before the vector becomes active in the Spring, and
by vaccinating any animals born during 2009.
Be very careful not to import disease when importing
animals.
IMPORTS OF LIVE ANIMALS
Because the
BTV Protection Zone that covers all of mainland Britain
is confluent with the BTV.8 PZ in Europe, there are no
BTV-related restrictions applying to imports of live
animals from within that PZ. In effect, it is just the
same as moving animals from Kent to Lancashire.
However,
there are risks in doing this as has been shown by the
post-importation testing carried out by Defra. In 2008,
at least 10 groups of imported animals have been found
to be positive to BTV.8 virus and on 25 November, it
was announced that a group of cattle imported from south
west France were positive to BTV.1 virus. Fortunately,
there has been no evidence that any virus circulated
from these imported animals to other animals in the country
and, in effect, we got away with it. But there is no
doubt that these importations not only endanger our livestock
industry and our exports but they are widely reported
and give a dreadful image to the wider world.
The importation of BTV.1 infected animals has stimulated
a widespread call from both veterinarians and farming
groups to the livestock industry to stop importing
animals from mainland Europe. After months of urging
members to take care with European imports, the president
of the NFU, Peter Kendall, has now called for an
official ban. The President of the British Veterinary
Association, Nicky Paull, feels the same way: “To
me, it is very straightforward – stop importing
from areas where the bluetongue virus is known to
be circulating.”
There are legitimate reasons
why the British livestock industry wishes to import
animals but the message is loud and clear: Either
make sure the imported animals are protected from
BTV disease or risk having a complete ban imposed.
Minimum
precautions
All an importer needs to do is go
back to the movement restrictions that were in place
in the UK in the spring of 2008, when the vaccination
campaign had begun and the PZ was limited to the south
and east of England. At that time, to move animals from
within the PZ to the Free Areas in the rest of Great
Britain or for export:
1. The animals had to be vaccinated by a veterinary
surgeon and be accompanied by a veterinary certificate
of vaccination stating that: “I, the undersigned,
being a veterinary surgeon, certify that I vaccinated
the animals identified above….” giving
details of the vaccine used and the date(s) the animals
were vaccinated.
2. Either the full vaccination course had to be completed
more than 60 days before the date of movement;
Or (i) The full vaccination course had to be completed
at least 21 days before the date of movement, AND
(ii) The animals were subjected to an agent identification
PCR test with negative results, carried out at least
35 days after the full vaccination course was completed.
Please be responsible
BLG urges all
its members who are planning to import animals from
areas of Europe where BTV virus is known to be circulating
to act responsibly and insist on:
1. A veterinary certificate of vaccination.
2. An agent identification PCR test with negative
results, carried out at least 35 days after the full
vaccination course was completed.
By acting responsibly ourselves and urging our friends,
colleagues and neighbours to do likewise, we not
only improve the chances of protecting the British
livestock industry from imported disease but also
of negating the siren calls from others to ban all
imports.
Andrew J Taylor BA VetMB MRCVS
Chairman: BLG |